Missing is not zero.
When a source hasn’t synced, its value stays unknown and named. It never quietly becomes $0 in a total.
Choose the attribution rule once. Every report, channel view, and answer in weive uses it and says so, so planning starts from agreement instead of reconciliation.
When every team brings its own spreadsheet, the meeting becomes an argument about method. weive puts one stated rule under every number, so the conversation can be about what to do next.
This is the decision you make once for the whole team. Try each rule on the same order before you pick a default.
Compare rules on the same revenue, pick the one that fits your question, and make it the workspace default. The choice is visible everywhere it’s used.
Share a report that your team, finance, and leadership can all read the same way: the number, the method, and the limits, together.
Ask weive the question you’re about to be asked. The answer comes with its sources, its rule, and its limits.
Under Linear, search earned 41% of matched revenue at 2.6× known return, and social 29% at 1.9×. Credit is not incremental lift, so test before moving large budgets.
When a source hasn’t synced, its value stays unknown and named. It never quietly becomes $0 in a total.
Attribution shows how a rule shares credit across recorded touches. It never claims an ad caused the sale.
Two platforms can claim the same sale. weive credits the payment once, and keeps each claim visible beside it.
Google Ads, Meta, HubSpot, and Stripe connect in a few clicks. One snippet adds the pixel to your site.
Linear, first touch, last touch, last non-direct, time decay, or U-shaped. Switch whenever you like; the outcomes never change.
Every number carries its sources, its rule, and its coverage, so the next budget move starts from evidence.
Anyone can compare rules, but the workspace default keeps shared reports consistent. Every figure states which rule it uses.
Platform dashboards report their own claims. weive keeps those claims and adds credit from your payments and CRM under one stated rule.
No. Attribution shows how credit is shared across recorded touches. weive keeps that separate from causal lift, so credit is never presented as proof.